Deleted user
posted 3 years ago
Can the insurer avoid the obligation to defend by speculating about extraneous 'facts'?
Would the insurer be allowed to "speculate" that the claimant with property damage most likely meant something else than defined in the policy and shift the burden of proof upon the insured to prove otherwise?
  • United Kingdom
  • Insurance

Answer this Post

Login into your account and answer this post

Contribute Now