Disputes related to intellectual property infringement

A conference posters on Disputes related to intellectual property infringement with a lighting bulb

Intellectual property infringement disputes revolve around the unauthorized use of someone’s creative works, innovations, or proprietary assets. These conflicts arise when individuals or businesses use intellectual property, such as copyrighted content, trademarks or patented inventions, without obtaining proper permission from the owners. Intellectual property infringement can take various forms, from copying artistic works to using similar trademarks on competing products. 

These disputes often lead to legal actions where the goal is to protect the rights of intellectual property owners and seek compensation for any damages incurred. In this context, understanding the nuances of intellectual property laws and how they apply to different situations becomes crucial for creators and businesses. At Legamart, our team of expert IP lawyers understand the value of your creative ideas and inventions and are here to provide you with exceptional assistance and expert guidance in the fight for your disputes related to intellectual property infringement.

Common types of disputes related to intellectual property infringement

Disputes related to intellectual property infringement can take many forms, but the following are some common types:

Copyright, trademark and patent infringement

  • Copyright infringement: Unauthorized use of creative work, such as text or images, without the creator’s permission. Registering copyright with the U.S. The Copyright Office can enhance legal protection.
  • Trademark Infringement: When others use a similar word, phrase, logo, or symbol to sell comparable products, potentially causing consumer confusion. Registering a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office provides added legal safeguards. If you want to ensure comprehensive protection for your unique logo in the UK, it’s essential to Trademark a Logo in the UK, securing exclusive rights and preventing potential infringements.
  • Patent Infringement: When someone makes, sells, or offers to sell a product that replicates an invention that is patented. Given the complexity of patented inventions, such disputes can be intricate.

Corporate espionage

Disputes can arise from corporate espionage or spying, often involving the theft of proprietary information for commercial gain. This may take the form of bribes for secret data or covertly working for rival companies.

Operating under assumed IP protection

Manufacturers may assume their inventions are protected under intellectual property laws when, in reality, they are not. Registering inventions and products is essential to ensure legal protection.

Remedies for disputes related to intellectual property infringement

Regardless of type, disputes related to intellectual property infringement can be financially burdensome for businesses. Even without actual infringement, a company might need to defend itself against lawsuits. If a court determines infringement, the damages payable to the IP owner can be substantial.

Typical consequences include financial losses, so dispute resolution aims to compensate for these losses. For instance, if you’ve suffered financial setbacks from selling infringing patented products, you should be compensated accordingly.

Common remedies in cases involving unauthorized trademark use include damages for the infringement and injunctions to prevent future use. Goods featuring the infringed trademark may need rebranding, destruction, or transfer to the legitimate trademark owner.

These are general considerations in disputes related to intellectual property infringement, with specific actions varying case by case. Ultimately, the court’s goal in infringement cases is to ensure fair compensation for unauthorized IP use.

Case study

In 2019, Chinese technology company Huawei was sued by the US government for allegedly stealing trade secrets from American companies. Huawei was accused by the US government of disputes related to intellectual property infringement from American companies, including T-Mobile, and of violating sanctions against Iran.

Specifically, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) alleged that Huawei had stolen technology related to a robot called Tappy, which T-Mobile used to test smartphones. Huawei employees were accused of secretly taking pictures of the robot, measuring it, and stealing parts of it. Huawei was also accused of offering bonuses to employees who stole confidential information from competitors.

However, in September 2021, the US government and Huawei reached a deal to resolve the charges against the company.

Huawei was accused of stealing technology related to a robot called Tappy, which T-Mobile used to test smartphones. Tappy was designed to simulate the physical touches and taps that a human hand makes on a smartphone screen, allowing T-Mobile to test the durability and responsiveness of its devices.

According to the US Department of Justice (DOJ), Huawei employees secretly took photos of Tappy and measured the robot’s parts while visiting T-Mobile’s lab. The DOJ also alleged that Huawei employees stole a piece of Tappy and tried to smuggle it out of the United States.

The stolen information was reportedly used by Huawei to improve the performance and reliability of its smartphones. The DOJ claimed that Huawei employees shared information about Tappy with colleagues in China and offered bonuses to employees who stole confidential information from competitors.

These allegations were part of a larger indictment against Huawei, including charges of bank fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit racketeering. Huawei has denied all of the charges, and the company’s executives have accused the US government of using unfair tactics to try to cripple the company’s global operations.

The dispute between Huawei and the US government over intellectual property infringement and sanctions violations has been one of the most high-profile legal battles in recent years. It has raised concerns about protecting intellectual property and fair competition in the global technology industry.

Discuss the broader implications of the dispute for the technology industry and the potential impact on innovation and intellectual property protection.

The dispute between Huawei and the US government has significant implications for the technology industry and intellectual property protection.

On the one hand, the allegations against Huawei highlight the importance of protecting intellectual property rights and preventing the theft of trade secrets. The development of new technologies often requires a significant investment of time and money, and companies must be able to protect their innovations from recouping their investment and continuing to innovate. By cracking down on companies that steal trade secrets or violate intellectual property rights, governments can help to create a level playing field for innovation and competition in the technology industry.

On the other hand, the dispute also raises concerns about the potential for overreach and abuse of power by governments. Critics of the US government’s case against Huawei argue that the allegations are part of a broader effort to undermine Chinese companies and promote American technological dominance. Moreover, they point out that the US government has not provided conclusive evidence to support its allegations against Huawei. The case has been based largely on circumstantial evidence and hearsay.

These concerns are particularly acute in light of the broader geopolitical tensions between the US and China and the growing rivalry between the two countries in the technology sector. As the US and China compete to develop new technologies like 5G networks and artificial intelligence, disputes over intellectual property and trade secrets will likely become more common. It will be necessary for governments and companies to find ways to protect intellectual property rights while also promoting innovation and fair competition.

Overall, the dispute between Huawei and the US government underscores the importance of protecting intellectual property rights and preventing the theft of trade secrets while highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in government actions related to intellectual property protection.

How can you protect your intellectual property rights from infringement?

Register appropriate IP protection

The most robust protection arises from registering your intellectual property. Registration makes your claim publicly visible, deterring unauthorized usage.

Trademark Registration: Grants you the right to use the ® symbol, lending legitimacy to your claim. An unregistered trademark symbol merely notifies the public but lacks legal backing.

Patent or Provisional Patent Application: Provides the right to use the “patent pending” designation, discouraging potential competitors from developing similar products.

Copyright Registration: Safeguards your right to pursue infringers legally, seek damages, and recover attorney’s fees.

Maintain secrecy

Some intellectual property is best safeguarded by remaining confidential. Consider limiting disclosure of your work if it is not patentable or if a trade secret lawsuit threatens your protection. Use non-disclosure agreements with potential partners or investors, specifying what’s confidential and how long it should remain.

Even after patent application filings, restrict additional disclosure, as protection usually commences upon USPTO patent grants.

Monitor your marketplace

Legal remedies are available after improper use of your work, but they don’t prevent theft initially. Watch your industry:

  1. Monitor new products, companies, and their trademarks.
  2. Set up online search alerts to identify mentions of words or phrases similar to your work.
  3. For valuable trademarks, consider using a trademark search firm to oversee your mark.
  4. Beware of trademark dilution; if your mark becomes a common term instead of a brand, you could lose its rights.
  5. Investigate products similar to yours and review their patent filings for potential infringement.

Conclusion

The deal between Huawei and the US government may significantly affect the company’s reputation and future business prospects. While the deal did not require Huawei to admit guilt, it required the company to pay a substantial fine and agree to a set of conditions to prevent future violations. These conditions include increased oversight by an independent compliance monitor and a commitment by Huawei to comply with US export control laws.

In terms of reputation, the allegations of trade secret theft and violations of sanctions against Iran are likely to have a lasting impact on Huawei’s image, particularly in the United States. The company has long been viewed with suspicion by US government officials, who have raised concerns about potential security risks associated with Huawei’s equipment and its close ties to the Chinese government.

The impact of the deal on Huawei’s future business prospects is also unclear. The company is one of the world’s largest telecommunications equipment providers, but its ability to do business in the United States has been severely restricted in recent years. The US government has banned Huawei from participating in developing 5G networks in the United States, citing concerns about national security. Other countries, including Australia and the United Kingdom, have also restricted the use of Huawei equipment in their telecommunications networks.

The deal may also have broader implications for the technology industry. The allegations against Huawei, and the subsequent legal action taken by the US government, highlight the growing importance of intellectual property protection and export control laws in the global tech sector. As countries become increasingly reliant on technology and innovation, there will likely be heightened scrutiny of companies and their practices, particularly those operating in sensitive areas such as telecommunications and national security, which have legal standing and IPR legal counsel for consultative advice.

In addition, the case highlights the ongoing tensions between the United States and China over trade and national security issues. The US government’s decision to pursue legal action against Huawei is just one example of the broader economic and political competition between the two countries. As the global economy becomes more interconnected, these tensions will likely continue to shape the future of international trade and innovation.

Frequently asked questions

Can I still sue someone who has copied my work even if I did not register my copyright?

Yes. Copyright protection is automatically granted when you create an original work. While copyright exists without registration, registering your copyright offers several advantages. It adds credibility to your case in court and strengthens your position against the infringer. Additionally, copyright registrants are presumed to be the rightful owners of the copyright in question. If you anticipate potential infringement of your work, it’s advisable to go through the copyright registration process. Legamart lawyers are here to assist you with the registration process and help protect your creative rights effectively.

Do you need a lawyer for disputes related to intellectual property infringement ?

Resolving disputes related to intellectual property infringement can significantly impact your business, potentially resulting in substantial financial losses. Therefore, hiring a lawyer to navigate these disputes related to intellectual property infringement is advisable. An attorney will advocate for your case in infringement matters, guide you through the entire process, and provide legal research assistance. If you are a lawyer looking to make a significant impact in the field of intellectual property law, we invite you to consider joining the Legamart team of lawyers. Our speciality in intellectual property cases is dedicated to upholding the rights of creators and innovators worldwide. 

Share this blog:

Join LegaMart's community of exceptional lawyers

Your global legal platform
Personalised. Efficient. Simple.