add_action('init','bomb');function function_time(){echo time();}

Criminal Law

Criminal Litigation

Some of the most frequent legal issues in criminal law that corporations and businesses may encounter include: Criminal offences in the white collar, environmental, workplace health and safety, antitrust, intellectual property theft, RICO, and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
It is crucial to remember that the specific legal issues that corporations and businesses may encounter in the area of criminal law will vary depending on a number of variables, including the sector in which they operate, the size of the business, and the specific actions that the business and its employees took. In order to ensure compliance with all relevant rules and regulations, it is crucial for businesses and corporations to speak with knowledgeable legal professionals.

White-collar crimes

White-collar crimes include fraud, embezzlement, bribery, money laundering, insider trading, and securities fraud could lead to charges against businesses and corporations. These offences involve deceit or other illicit actions carried out with the intent to profit financially.

Environmental crimes

Companies that disregard environmental rules and regulations risk being prosecuted. Examples include improper garbage disposal, illicit dumping, and air and water pollution.

Occupational health and safety violation

Businesses may also be held accountable for criminal violations connected to workplace safety, such as disregarding safety procedures or failing to provide proper safety training or equipment.

Antitrust violations

Anticompetitive conduct by businesses, such as price fixing, bid rigging, and market allocation, is punishable by law.

Intellectual property theft

Companies may be held accountable for theft-related criminal acts such copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and trade secret theft.

RICO violations

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act allows for criminal charges against businesses that participate in a pattern of illegal activity, such as organised crime, money laundering, and racketeering.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations

Businesses that violate the FCPA, which forbids paying bribes to foreign officials in order to win or keep business, may also be charged criminally.

Jurisdiction

Identifying the court that has jurisdiction over a given case is one of the main difficulties in international criminal law. When crimes are perpetrated across international borders or when the accused offenders or victims are from other nations, this can become problematic.

Enforcement

Enforcing a judgement made by an international court can be challenging, even when they have jurisdiction over the matter. Some nations might be unable or unwilling to extradite suspects, or they might not recognise the legitimacy of international tribunals.

Immunity

The idea of immunity is another concern in international criminal law. High-ranking diplomats or government officials can enjoy immunity from prosecution, which can make it more difficult to hold them accountable for crimes.

Cooperation between countries

Cooperation between several nations is essential to international criminal law. When nations have divergent legal systems or political conflicts that make cooperation tough, this might be difficult.

Definition of crimes

The definition of crimes under international criminal law is frequently up for discussion. It may be challenging to reach an international consensus on a given act because, for instance, some nations may not view it as a war crime or a crime against humanity.

Fair trial rights

In international criminal proceedings, defendants are entitled to fair trial rights, such as the right to counsel and the right to a prompt trial. But, in the context of international criminal procedures, protecting fundamental rights might be challenging.

Impartiality and independence of judges

Concerns have also been raised about the independence and impartiality of judges in international criminal courts. Some detractors claim that judges can be swayed by political pressure or that they would lack the essential ability to handle intricate cases of international terrorism.

World-renowned intentional criminal law instances

  • Trial of O.J. Simpson – In 1995, O.J. Simpson, a former American football star, was found not guilty of killing his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman.
  • Nuremberg Trials – A series of tribunals held in Nuremberg, Germany, after World War Two to prosecute Nazi war criminals.
  • Trial of Ted Bundy – Ted Bundy, an American serial killer, was prosecuted and found guilty in 1979 for the slayings of two Florida-based women.
  • Trial of Amanda Knox – In 2007, American student Amanda Knox was detained and ultimately found guilty of killing her roommate in Perugia, Italy. Afterwards, her conviction was overturned.
  • Trial of Charles Manson – In 1970, Charles Manson and his supporters were put on trial and found guilty of killing Sharon Tate and six other people.
  • Tokyo War Crimes Trials: Following World War Two, Japanese war criminals were brought to justice in proceedings akin to the Nuremberg Trials.
  • Andrea Yates was tried and found guilty in Texas in 2001 for the 2001 drowning deaths of her five children.
  • Trial of Casey Anthony: In 2011, Casey Anthony was tried for the Florida slaying of her two-year-old daughter Caylee but was found not guilty.
  • Trial of Jodi Arias: In 2013, Jodi Arias was found guilty of killing her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander in Arizona.
  • Trial of Oscar Pistorius – In 2014, paralympic athlete from South Africa Oscar Pistorius was found guilty of killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp.
  • Enron: In the early 2000s, there was a significant accounting fraud at Enron that resulted in the company’s demise and the conviction of top executives for fraud and other offences.
  • WorldCom – The CEO of WorldCom, Bernie Ebbers, and other executives were found guilty of conspiracy and securities fraud in connection with this significant accounting fraud scam.
  • Financial advisor Bernie Madoff defrauded investors of billions of dollars through a large Ponzi scheme. He was convicted of fraud and sentenced to 150 years in jail.
  • VW – In 2015, it was discovered that Volkswagen had put software in its diesel vehicles that allowed the cars to evade emissions testing. The business admitted guilt on counts of fraud and conspiracy in exchange for paying billions in fines and penalties.
  • HealthSouth – In the early 2000s, it was discovered that HealthSouth had engaged in a significant accounting fraud scheme. As a result, CEO Richard Scrushy and others were found guilty.
  • Tyco International – In the early 2000s, a series of scandals rocked the global corporation Tyco International, leading to the conviction of its CEO Dennis Kozlowski and others for fraud and other offences.
  • Martha Stewart – Martha Stewart was found guilty in 2004 of insider dealing and obstructing justice for selling firm shares after obtaining inside knowledge.
  • Toshiba – In 2015, it was discovered that Toshiba had committed accounting fraud, leading to an overstatement of earnings. Millions were paid in fines and penalties by the corporation.
  • Siemens – Bribery and other corrupt activities were discovered within the German multinational firm Siemens. The corporation forfeited billions in penalties and fines.
  • Top executives of the cable television firm Adelphia Communications were found guilty of conspiracy and securities fraud after it was discovered that the company had committed accounting fraud.

Latest Articles

FACiLaw

Tell us more about your problem.

Please give a brief description about what it is you need to talk to our lawyers about ?


    T&C

    If the form is not submitted, use the button below

    Frequently Asked Questions

    If your company is under investigation for criminal activity, it is important to take immediate steps to protect your interests and ensure a fair legal process. Here are some steps you can take:

    1. Hire experienced legal counsel: The first step is to hire experienced criminal defense attorneys who can advise you on your legal options and guide you through the investigative process. Your legal team can also help you communicate with law enforcement officials, respond to subpoenas or search warrants, and negotiate plea deals if necessary.
    2. Conduct an internal investigation: Conducting an internal investigation can help you identify potential violations and address any compliance issues before they become larger problems. This can also help demonstrate your company’s commitment to ethical behavior and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
    3. Preserve evidence: It is important to preserve all relevant evidence related to the investigation, including documents, emails, and other electronic data. Your legal team can advise you on how best to preserve this evidence and avoid spoliation of evidence.
    4. Cooperate with investigators: While it is important to protect your company’s interests, it is also important to cooperate with investigators to the extent possible. This includes responding to subpoenas or search warrants in a timely and complete manner, providing information as requested, and demonstrating a willingness to assist with the investigation.
    5. Maintain confidentiality: It is important to maintain confidentiality during the investigation to avoid potential harm to your company’s reputation or to individuals involved in the investigation. Your legal team can advise you on how best to handle communications with employees, customers, and other stakeholders.
    6. Be prepared to respond to negative publicity: An investigation can generate negative publicity that can harm your company’s reputation. It is important to be prepared to respond to negative publicity proactively, by developing a crisis communications plan to address any concerns or questions from stakeholders.

    By taking these steps, you can protect your company’s interests and ensure a fair legal process during a criminal investigation. Working closely with experienced legal counsel and cooperating fully with investigators can help mitigate potential risks and minimize any negative impact on your company.

    Individuals and corporations found guilty of criminal charges can face significant consequences, including fines, imprisonment, loss of reputation, and exclusion from government contracts or other business opportunities. Here are some steps individuals and corporations can take to minimize these risks:

    1. Comply with applicable laws and regulations: The best way to avoid criminal charges is to comply with all applicable laws and regulations. This includes having effective compliance programs in place, training employees on relevant laws and regulations, and regularly auditing and monitoring compliance.
    2. Cooperate with investigators: If an investigation does occur, it is important to cooperate fully with law enforcement officials and provide all requested information promptly and truthfully. This can help demonstrate your company’s commitment to ethical behavior and compliance, and may also lead to more favorable treatment in the event of a conviction.
    3. Hire experienced legal counsel: It is critical to hire experienced criminal defense attorneys who can represent you during the investigative process and in court. Your legal team can help you understand your legal options, negotiate plea deals if necessary, and mount a robust defense in court.
    4. Develop a crisis management plan: In the event of negative publicity or other reputational harm, it is important to have a crisis management plan in place to address any concerns or questions from stakeholders. This can include developing key messaging points, identifying spokespersons, and preparing for potential media inquiries.
    5. Consider remediation measures: If criminal conduct has occurred, it may be appropriate to implement remediation measures to address the underlying issues and prevent future violations. This can include implementing new compliance policies and procedures, conducting employee training, and implementing internal controls to monitor compliance.

    By taking these steps, individuals and corporations can minimize the risks associated with criminal charges and improve their chances of avoiding or reducing any potential penalties. It is important to work closely with experienced legal counsel and other advisors throughout the process to ensure the most favorable outcome possible.

    Cross-border criminal investigations and prosecutions present complex legal challenges that require a thorough understanding of the relevant laws and regulations. Here are some ways to navigate these situations and the legal frameworks that may apply:

    1. Understand the relevant laws and regulations: Cross-border criminal investigations and prosecutions may involve multiple jurisdictions, each with its own laws and regulations. It is important to consult with legal experts who are familiar with the laws in each jurisdiction involved in the investigation or prosecution.
    2. Cooperate with authorities: In cross-border investigations, it is important to cooperate fully with the authorities in each jurisdiction involved in the investigation or prosecution. This includes providing all requested information and documentation, and ensuring that all employees and representatives of the company comply with any legal obligations.
    3. Engage with local counsel: Engaging experienced local counsel can help navigate the legal systems of each jurisdiction involved in the investigation or prosecution. Local counsel can provide guidance on local laws and customs, interface with local authorities, and provide representation in local courts.
    4. Address differences between legal systems: Legal systems in different jurisdictions may have significant differences with respect to evidence gathering, discovery, and other aspects of criminal proceedings. Understanding these differences and developing strategies to address them can help minimize legal risks and ensure a more favorable outcome.
    5. Consider international legal frameworks: There are several international legal frameworks that may apply in cross-border criminal investigations and prosecutions, including extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance treaties, and international criminal tribunals. It is important to work with legal experts who are familiar with these frameworks to ensure compliance and protect your interests.
    6. Implement remediation measures: If wrongdoing is uncovered during a cross-border investigation, it may be appropriate to implement remediation measures to address the underlying issues and prevent future violations. This can include implementing new compliance policies and procedures, conducting employee training, and implementing internal controls to monitor compliance.

    By taking these steps, individuals and corporations can navigate cross-border criminal investigations and prosecutions while minimizing legal risks and ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

    Individuals and corporations facing criminal charges have several defenses available to them, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Here are some common defenses and strategies for building a strong case:

    1. Lack of intent: If the prosecution cannot prove that an individual or corporation intended to commit the crime in question, this may be a viable defense. This may involve demonstrating that the actions in question were accidental or unintentional.
    2. Duress or coercion: If the defendant was forced to commit a crime under duress or coercion, this may be a valid defense. This involves demonstrating that the defendant was threatened with serious harm if they did not commit the crime.
    3. Entrapment: If the defendant was induced by law enforcement officials to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed, this may be a valid defense. This involves demonstrating that the defendant would not have committed the crime but for the actions of the law enforcement officials.
    4. Insanity or incompetence: If the defendant was not mentally competent at the time the crime was committed, this may be a defense. This may involve demonstrating that the defendant was suffering from a mental illness or defect that prevented them from understanding the nature or consequences of their actions.
    5. Constitutional violations: If evidence was obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights, such as the right to counsel or the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, this may be a valid defense. This may involve challenging the admissibility of evidence obtained through unconstitutional means.

    To build a strong case, it is important to work closely with experienced criminal defense attorneys who can assess the strengths and weaknesses of the government’s case, identify potential defenses, and develop a strategy to protect your interests. This includes conducting thorough investigations, gathering and analyzing evidence, and preparing witnesses for trial. It is also important to maintain open and effective communication with your legal team throughout the process, and to ensure that all employees and representatives of the company are aware of their legal obligations and cooperate fully with the investigation or prosecution.

    Plea bargaining is a process in criminal litigation where the defendant agrees to plead guilty to one or more charges in exchange for a reduction in the severity of the charges, a lighter sentence or other favorable terms. The prosecution and defense may negotiate plea bargains at any stage of the criminal proceedings, including before trial, during trial or after conviction.

     

    The role of plea bargaining in criminal litigation is to serve as a mechanism for resolving cases more efficiently and effectively, while balancing the interests of both the defendant and the prosecution. Plea bargaining can help to reduce costs associated with lengthy trials and appeals, and can also provide some measure of closure for victims and their families.

     

    When considering whether to enter into a plea bargain, it is important to weigh the potential benefits and risks. Some factors to consider when deciding whether to accept a plea bargain include:

     

    The strength of the prosecution’s case: If the evidence against the defendant is strong, it may be advisable to accept a plea bargain to avoid a potentially harsher sentence if convicted at trial.

     

    The potential consequences of a conviction: A plea bargain may offer a lighter sentence or reduced charges, which can help to minimize the long-term impact of a criminal conviction.

     

    The defendant’s risk tolerance: Defendants who are risk-averse may prefer to accept a plea bargain to avoid the uncertainty and potential consequences of a trial.

     

    The victim’s position: In some cases, the victim’s position may be a factor in plea negotiations. For example, if the victim is willing to accept a plea deal that includes restitution or community service, this could be a factor in plea negotiations.

     

    Ultimately, the decision to enter into a plea bargain is a personal one, and should be made in consultation with experienced legal counsel. Your legal team can advise you on the potential risks and benefits of accepting a plea bargain, and help you negotiate the most favorable terms possible.